Top Stories on CNN at 10:40 p.m. PST on July 25, 2009:
50% Michael Jackson
20% Mark Sanford
10% Jon & Kate
10% Air France Crash
10% Farrah Fawcett
To recap: 70% Show Business, 20% political sex scandal, 10% plane crash
Compare that with the 10 posts on
Andrew Sullivan's top 10 at the time. (
I've outlined the topic where not obvious.)
-
E-mail of the day (Topic: Iran)
- Thinking about Michael II
- Thinking about Michael
- Blue Suits And The Seventies
-
The Ways Of Rove (Topic: Politicization of DOJ under Bush)
-
The Retaliator (Topic: Hawks vs. Doves)
-
"Like Butcher," Ctd (Topic: Iran)
-
Yglesias Award Nominee (Topic: Same Sex Marriage)
- RIP
-
Blessed Are The Geeks (Topic: Technology's impact on Iran)
30% Iran
30% Michael Jackson
10% Same Sex Marriage
10% Bringing Bush to Justice
10% Reader Analysis of Conflict Management "Types" Post
10% Blue Suits - (huh?)
Recap: 60% Serious news or analysis, 30% Show Business, 10% random reminiscences.
This, in a nutshell, is why I have issues with the way people respond and react to celebrity coverage in the US. Yes, art is important. Yes, we should celebrate talented musicians, actors, etc. But should coverage of celebrity deaths, divorces and affairs - in short, the things normal people do all the time without much undue attention - really trump serious analysis of major world issues?
Update: Sullivan calls out our fixation in his
beautifully crafted obit:
I grieve for him; but I also grieve for the culture that created and destroyed him. That culture is ours' and it is a lethal and brutal one: with fame and celebrity as its core values, with money as its sole motive, it chewed this child up and spat him out.
0 Comments