I recently got into pole fitness as an extension of my yoga practice and my love of dance. It's an unbelievably gymnastic workout - and I find that my style is well suited to twirling and flying around. I truly do believe that
it should be an Olympic sport.
Pole fitness has obvious ties to the exotic dance industry, an association that many instructors and studios seem to find torturous. They go to great pains to distinguish themselves by saying that the aim of pole fitness is to empower women. But like so many businesses that make that claim - they often get it a little wrong in the details.
Take
this blog posting, "5 reasons why you shouldn’t dance for him!", in which instructor Angi Cardwell writes:
Well, here we are on the subject that comes up a lot and sort of circulates around the topic of pole dancing: Dancing/stripping for your boyfriend...
I have given it a lot of thought over the years and am convinced that it does more harm than good to give your man a dance. (Husbands not included. Married ladies dance your hearts out). Here are my reasons why:
...It reduces your worth in his eyes...You have just established yourself as a public playground in his mind. (ouch! that hurts)...By sleeping with and dancing for your man you are depriving him of his essential manly drive to earn it! (That’s not nice). Men value what they earn.
...You are disabling the best bad seed eliminator that you have. You don’t dance for him, you don’t sleep with him and he walks. High five!!! You just avoided a whole lotta heartache.
...He will value you and the relationship more if you don’t. You will increase the worth of yourself and all women by doing your part....
Do we really need to give it up like that ladies?
This is the part of pole dance culture that I find really frustrating. The business is still caught up in the double bind of women as sex objects, women's worth as related to sexuality, and the virgin-whore complex.
Angi's whole argument is predicated on the longstanding notion that a woman's worth as a potential life partner rests mostly or solely in her sexuality, and that all the good men are all so one-dimensional as to believe it.
A woman's worth is not based on the number of sexual partners she's had or the number of men she's danced for. It's based on her wholeness as a person, her initiative, her accountability, her compassion, her open-heartedness, her authenticity, her honesty, and her willingness to go beyond what is easy to do what is right. Sex is a part of that, yes, but even the sexual component has more to do with the qualities I just mentioned than it does with any particular standard of chastity. There is something really wrong with this idea that a woman is automatically damaged goods if she's promiscuous or sexually voracious, and I would not want to be with any man who held such a worldview.
I don't think that good men are so simple-minded as to make a judgment about the woman they are dating based solely on what she does or does not do in the bedroom. Men worth being with will look at the whole person they are with and find that person worth of love whether she had sex with them on the first date, the third, the 100th or for the first time on their wedding night.
Pole fitness as a sport claims to return women's lost sense of self-worth, but arguments like these are not advancing that cause. Self-worth is about wholeness as a person, body, mind, and soul - a combination that is unique for each woman, indeed, for each human creature. That could mean chastity until marriage, a life of joyful debauchery, complete celibacy, or some combination of those practices and others throughout a lifetime.
I think we should give ourselves permission to dance - or not dance - for our romantic partners as we see fit. If they walk out on us or treat us with less respect because we have acted on our own adult desires, well...that's the best "bad seed eliminator" you could ever have.
0 Comments